KNE top navigation bar

Videoconferencing for Learning Homepage

Links to other videoconferencing resources.
Glossary ______________________________________________________________

Evaluating the Videoconference

 

A good deal of planning and preparation probably went into setting up and conducting your videoconference. Don't lose an opportunity to make the next one better. When the videoconference is over, take formal steps to evaluate what could be done to improve the next one. Consider taping the session and viewing it later. Jot down notes during and after the session. Get feedback from participants. Not only are there technical issues that might benefit from an evaluation; but the instructional or content presentation aspects might also be improved. The ideas below are a good starting point:


Examples | Instructional Strategies |
Multipoint | Compressed Video | Equipment |
Communication Skills | Planning | Evaluating

__________________________________________________________
-A Few Good Questions . . .
Evaluation is a very important step for effective videoconferencing and one that is so easy to overlook! If no evaluation is done, the technology and instruction might not be adapted to better meet the needs of the learners. Here are some questions to ask yourself, the learners, and support staff. These questions can be adapted for any kind of videoconferencing event whether a meeting, an interview, or other usage. However, in instructional settings, getting answers to these questions will definitely lead to improvement.
  1. What were the intended outcomes of the lesson? Were they achieved?
  2. Were expectations clear prior to the lesson?
  3. Was the lesson technically effective?
  4. What did you like/dislike about using the technology?
  5. What would have improved the lesson?
  6. What should be done differently next time?
  7. How did the experience compare to a more typical classroom experience (pros/cons)?


- Instructor Evaluation Form
We worked with Dr. Victoria Bernhardt, Director of Education for the Future, to devise evaluation forms. This form is available in MS Word document format. If you'd like to download and customize it (for example, the original form provided an opportunity to add comments after each question) or print it, please feel free to do so. It looks something like this:

Instructor(s): Date of videoconference:
Title of videoconference: Length of videoconference:
Number of viewers: Number of sites:
What were the intended outcomes of the videoconference and how well were they achieved? (please attach description if necessary)  
Circle the number that represents your feelings about these questions
Not at all Effective
 
 
 

Very Effective

How effective was the content of the videoconference? (how well was the content delivered)

1
2
3
4
5
How well did the content of the videoconference connect to your curriculum?
1
2
3
4
5
How effective was the videoconference technically, e.g., clear picture, clear sound? (how well the technology worked)
1
2
3
4
5
What did you like about using the technology?  
What were the benefits of using this technology?  
What did you not like about using the technology?  
What would have made the videoconference better?  
What will you do differently the next time?  
General comments?  
Download the MSWord form


-Viewer Evaluation Form
Dr. Bernhardt also helped develop this form to be used with videoconferencing participants and remote learners. This form is available in MS Word document format. If you'd like to download and customize it (for example, the original form provided an opportunity to add comments after each question) or print it, please feel free to do so. It looks something like this:

Instructor(s): Date of videoconference:
Title of videoconference: Length of videoconference:
Briefly describe the videoconference  
Circle the number that represents your feelings about these questions
Not at all Clear
  
   
   

Very Clear

How clear were your expectations before the videoconference began?
1
2
3
4
5
How clear were expectations for participation after the videoconference began?
1
2
3
4
5
Circle the number that represents your feelings about these questions
Not at all Effective
 
 
 

Very Effective

How effective was the content of the videoconference? (how well content was delivered)
1
2
3
4
5
How effective was the videoconference technically e.g., clear picture, clear sound? (how well the technology worked)
1
2
3
4
5
Circle the number that represents your feelings about these questions
No Opportunity
 
 
 

Many opportunities

Did your site have opportunities to interact with the person or people at the other site(s)?
1
2
3
4
5
What were you hoping to get out of the teleconference, and did you get it?  
What did you like about using this technology?  
What were the benefits of using this technology?  
What did you not like about using this technology?  
What suggestions do you have for the presenter(s) to make the videoconference better?  
How did learning new information in this fashion compare to in-person, in-class presentations?  
General Comments?  
Download the MSWord form


-Final Thoughts
It is important to gather and process the information from the evaluation and synthesize it for distribution. Once this is done, you can distribute the evaluation report to interested parties such as other teachers, staff development planners, instructional designers, technical support staff, and administrators. It's a good idea to meet with these folks, and especially with technical support personnel, to debrief after the evaluation information is distributed so you can address the issues identified in evaluation and plan how you might incorporate solutions into future videoconferences.

 

     
Pardon Our Dust Sorry about any inconvenience you may encounter while we re-organize KNE.

Dynamic Solutions for Education
Transform teaching and learning. Technology is rapidly changing how and where students learn. CLICK HERE to see how AT&T is right there, helping to lead this transformation.

Networking Exchange
Subscribe now for personalized access to the latest networking and technology trends.  Customize your profile to receive only those topics of interest to you. Already a member? Sign In

 


First posted 1995.
Last modified Friday May 18, 2012

 ---------
KNE Home Feedback Search
Filamentality | E-Rate | CTF | Videoconferencing | CA Missions

© 2013 Copyright AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks contained herein are the property of their respective owners. AT&T 36USC220506 This site contains links to public sites whose content and language do not fall under the jurisdiction of AT&T. The views and opinions expressed at these sites are not those of AT&T. Please read our Disclaimer.

AT&T Corporate